Iâ€™ve just finished re-reading Deborah Tannenâ€™s early work (1990), You Just Donâ€™t Understand.Sheâ€™s a linguistic professor who has published some bestselling titles (Thatâ€™s Not What I Meant, Talking 9-5).Iâ€™d read it ages ago, when it first came out & found it both interesting and helpful.Rereading it offered new insights.
If youâ€™re a romance reader or writer, I expect youâ€™ve heard the comment, â€œThe whole story was just based on a misunderstanding! A five minute conversation would have cleared everything up on page twoâ€¦!â€
Well, spending five minutes with YJDU will clarify that communication between the sexes is rife with misunderstanding. That males and femalesâ€”from the very beginningâ€”bring quite different assumptions to conversations (both speaking and listening) and those assumptions can create significant misinterpretation, misunderstanding, frustration, anger, unhappiness, alienation and disappointment. A better understanding of the underlying assumptions on both sides can really help realign expectations and diminish misinterpretation. Additionally, the stories and research offer reassurance that you are not alone in your confusion, hurt, and frustration.
Before I became a romance editor and made my living on the differences between the sexes, I remember having a conversation with the father of a woman who had finally announced her engagement to her long-time partner. The couple hadnâ€™t gotten married because their respective families didnâ€™t approve of the relationships due to their being from different races or religions (canâ€™t recall the issue).
The parent was earnestly explaining to me that he wasnâ€™t racist (or whatever) but that building a successful marriage was so hard, and if the two parties came from totally different cultures, different upbringings, different experiences, that it would be that much harder to find the common ground needed to create a strong partnership.
As I listened, I sympathizedâ€”all his concerns were valid. And then I looked him in the eye and said, you know, I have never heard such a compelling treatise on the benefits of homosexual marriage. I mean with heterosexual relationships, you are asking people of the opposite sex to figure out a way to live together. Not easy! Thereâ€™s a reason itâ€™s called the opposite sexâ€¦.
Yes, when you think about building a strong partnership between two people who are different sexes, have totally different bodies, bring different assumptions, expectations and world view, have different conversational styles (in some ways a different language), and were raised differently, itâ€™s clear heterosexual marriage is not easy. That challenge has fueled countless stories, poems, songs and is often one of the central challenges of our lives.
Itâ€™s not easy to understand the opposite sex, but YJDU does give some helpful insights. Tannen opens with a perspective that had a lot of resonance for me: that all conversation has two diametrically opposed goals.
One is to connect, to reach out, to feel a bond with another, to feel part of the greater whole of humankind.
The other is the desire to maintain your sense of self, your autonomy, your uniqueness, your individuality and separateness.
Tannen indicates (my interpretation) that these simultaneous and opposite goals are present in every conversational interaction for both men and women. But she notes that men often have a slight default to autonomy in that 180 degree spread. And that women often have a slight default to connection. And that slight difference can and often does create a significant communication gap between the sexes.
If you think about it, much of â€œpolitenessâ€ (which can vary significantly in different cultures) has been created to enable people to communicate and connect in a non-threatening way. To enable others to feel â€˜safeâ€™ in connecting, reassured that they are not being asked to lose their autonomy or sense of self.
Romances are all about the puzzle of how to be both an individual and be part of a team. And many address the challenge of having the woman need to nurture her sense of self, validate her right to her own individuality and needs in order to balance her natural tendency to compromise for others. And additionally presenting the flip side: of having the man appreciate that there are appropriate and necessary compromises that he must make to be part of a team, and to learn to appreciate the unique gifts that that connection will bring.
Tannen's book sounds like a winner. You bring up a very interesting point, about how people often say "A five minute conversation would have cleared everything up!" Really? When does that ever happen in real life? Uou think it is so simple, then the conversation unravels…
One pet peeve of mine is when in TV shows and movies, years of angst will be resolved with one heartfelt conversation. As you – and Tannen – point out, it is seldom so simple.
Ah, but really understanding the "language barrier" and turning the struggle to understand into a compelling story is the very essence of what we strive to do.
Thanks for the heads up!
on April 25, 2012
I'll be picking up the book! Thanks for sharing. I guess that communication gap is part of what ignites some of the flames between the sexes….that's not all bad!
on April 24, 2012
Thought-provoking post! So true about that "commmunication gap" between men and women–what would we romance writers do without it?
on April 24, 2012
Excellent post. I read Tannen's book years ago, but it sounds like a good idea to revisit the book. And I would have _loved_ to see the look on that father's face when you started talking about the benefits of same sex marriage. One can only imagine, lol.