By Member at Large Monica Stoner, w/a Mona Karel
Deep in the recesses of my overstuffed memory is a ditty that supposedly did the rounds at a SciFi Convention. To the tune of â€œSheâ€™ll be Cominâ€™ â€˜Round the Mountainâ€
â€œThereâ€™s a dragon on the cover of my book
Thereâ€™s a dragon on the cover of my book
He is green and he is scale-y but heâ€™s nowhere in my tale-y
Thereâ€™s a dragon on the cover of my book.â€
In the process of research of this ditty, I came across several other stanzas, including a bimbo on the cover, and a castle on the cover (for a book set in Seattle) and slightly different wording. The ending I remember referred to having a â€œwrongâ€ cover is still better than finding oneâ€™s book in a remainder pile. By the way, if you Google that first line you can have a lot of fun missing out on your NaNo count while doing research.
Mind you this was a long time ago, before even Rocket Books (remember those?) had been created. Authors had no say in their covers, and were occasionally seen to wince when presented with the scantily clad heroine and the buff hero in excruciatingly tight trousers, open shirt, blond hair flying in the windâ€“never mind that heâ€™s written as a brunette and heâ€™s French. They were told the publisher knew what sold books much better than any writer.
Fast forward to now, and look at the changes in the publishing world. Digital books, print on demand, self publishing, author input on covers. And what do we see on many books? Bare chests, flowing hair, large breastsâ€“and thatâ€™s the male. Seems even when the option exists to have input on our covers, authors are opting for the beef cake.
Do these covers really sell more books, even when theyâ€™re only displayed on the computer screen because we read electronically? Is there really more market for headless bare chested men with impossibly large breasts and muscles where no one has ever seen muscles?
I realize some books lend themselves to these covers, since they are written more erotically. But not all of them. A friend did a survey for the cover of her second space opera book, showing various covers, and the most popular was the one with a bare chested man, with planets and space ships in the background. So maybe those covers do serve a purpose.
Iâ€™m contemplating covers since Black Opal Books has offered to publish my second book. The working title is â€œTeach Me To Forget,â€ and itâ€™s about a photographer and a writer. So should I have a well muscled nekkid chested guy on the cover, holding a camera? I feel fortunate with the cover on â€œMy Killer My Love,â€ since it conveys the mystery man in the woods concept, but I wonder if I should have looked farther for a more revealing photo?
What do you think, as writers and readers? Would you be more likely to pick up a book by an unknown author if the cover could qualify for serious eye candy?
Ive been VERY lucky with all my covers, but I have friends whose Covers have nothing to do with their story and Im sure its affected their sales. I have to admit its the Cover that will make me pick up a book first.
Hugs, Kari Thomas, http://www.authorkari.com
Though it's true the image on the cover is important, it's more true that the quality of the overall cover can impact sales. If it looks amateurish, readers will believe what's inside is just as bad. Whether the image is beefcake or as simple as a cottage in the woods, it must be handled professionally. I've been a professional graphic designer for over 30 years, so I have some experience with this.
There's a blog called Cover Art Review that lets visitors critique book covers that authors and artists have offered for feedback. See what some people are saying. The link is: http://coverartreview.blogspot.com
As an aside regarding the cover example someone gave a link to that shows the cover of a book about a photographer, this is a very busy cover. I caution against a crowded montage style of cover art. The composition might have too much going on and the title font fights with the image.
Mona, book cover and title play an important part of my decision to pick a new author's book. It doesn't necessarily mean a bare-chested guy. But a boring blah cover would definitely not get picked by me unless I've read the author before and loved their work. The decision to buy would be made after reading the blurb or the first line. If I already like the author, I don't even need the blurb. Like when I buy Olivia Gates, all I need to know is that she wrote it.
My experience is that a bad cover can hurt sales, but a good cover is, at best, neutral or maybe a little bit helpful. If you can control or influence your cover art, you have a better chance of not getting a bad cover, but this is easier with small press and indies than conglomerate presses.
I smiled as I read your post. Walk into any bookstore and peruse the romance section. Eighty percent of the covers have a naked chest on them. Different colors of print or background, put same air-brushed chest. As if the readers are too dumb to chose a book based on an intelligent, thought provoking cover. IMHO, it's overkill. For my covers, I explicitly say, no bare chests. Thank goodness I'm with a small publisher who listens.
for me the color of the book and the look what stand out and then
it will stand out in the store i have walk in to the book store and
bought book because of the cover
i do ask the autohor for cover or \book marks of the book i collect them and then i can in joy them
Here is a link to a friends cover about her female photographer:
I love the covers and the camera fits. Unless it's an erotic story. I don't really want manly muscle on the cover. There comes a point where there is too much sexual promotion.
Comments are closed.