Iâ€™m about to make a sweeping generalization…but I hope someone out there can prove me wrong.
Have you ever noticed that when you read a book and see the movie of the same story, the book is always better than the movie?
There are a couple of simple explanations… A book allows you to get into the characterâ€™s head better, because their thoughts are on the page. And when you look at how much shorter a screenplay is than a book, you realize the screenwriters have to lose a lot of material from the book in order to fit it into a movie.
But on the other hand… A movie can be so much more visual, and can bring a book to life in an almost tangible way. So why is the book always better? Or am I wrong about this?
There are some movies Iâ€™ve enjoyed without ever reading the original novel. Youâ€™ve Got Mail, based on the book The Shop Around The Corner. Heartburn, from the book of the same title. I canâ€™t comment on the book v. movie question there.
And I have to say, The Sound of Music (my favorite movie) was better than the book The Von Trapp Family Singers. But it doesnâ€™t really count, as the movie was only very loosely based on the book. It wasnâ€™t an adaptation of the book for the big screen.
Some great books have been transformed into terrible movies. The Bonfire of the Vanities (horribly miscast, IMHO). Captain Corelliâ€™s Mandolin. And my kids tell me they didnâ€™t enjoy the Eragon movie (they loved the book). Reportedly, The Other Boleyn Girl was a poor reflection of the book, but I havenâ€™t seen that one.
There have, of course, been some excellent adaptationsâ€”the Harry Potter movies, a couple of John Grisham stories, Stephen Kingâ€™s Miseryâ€”but I wouldnâ€™t say they were better than the original books.
I havenâ€™t read The Diving Bell And The Butterfly, nor read the book. Apparently they’re both great – I donâ€™t know which to do first. Any recommendations?
When I hear that a book I love is being made into a movie, Iâ€™m cast into nail-biting anticipation about how good the movie will end up. Can Sophie Kinsellaâ€™s Shopaholic heroine Becky Bloomwood be as brilliant on screen as she is in the books?
I wonder what the secret is to turning a great book into an even better movie…if thatâ€™s possible. Iâ€™ll bet Blake Snyder knowsâ€”heâ€™s a Hollywood screenwriter who gave a brilliant talk about story structure at the Romance Writers of America convention last weekend.
What do you think about the book v. movie question? Give me your recommendations for â€œa great movie from a book,â€ and Iâ€™ll go rent the DVD. Abby
A movie better than the book? Jaws! The movie is sooo much better! I also like the 80’s version of the Scarlet Pimpernel with Anthony Andrews and Jane Seymour better than the book. (Yes, there are other versions – I own 3 different movie versions of Scarlet P. and have seen the musical!) As for a book that is a dead heat with its movie, A Room With a View and its 80’s movie version with Helena Bonham-Carter and Julian Sands.
-Geralyn (I video-podcasted you at the literacy signing at Conference!)
on August 10, 2008
Laura, I didn’t see TKaM on the basis that I didn’t want to see them mess up a great story. You’ve given me hope, I’ll have to watch the DVD!
I don’t know The Stand (I’m too squeamish for much of King). Gone with the Wind…you’re right, both the book and the movie were great. I’d probably come down on the side of the book if forced at gunpoint to make choice. Yeah, that’s gonna happen, right… Abby
on August 10, 2008
I agree – almost by definition the book has to be better. But I have a couple that were as good –
To Kill a Mockingbird – neither one could be any better.
The Stand – Stephen King – I hesitated to see the series, because the book was one of my favorites, but it was great – in a different way.
Gone with the Wind – good equally for different reasons
On the Beach
Great Topic Abby! Laura
on August 8, 2008
Hey Travis, thanks for the heads up. I loved the movie, but haven’t read the book. Abby
on August 8, 2008
Forrest Gump was a lot better on the screen than on the page.